Ancient Ancestors to Humans Had Not One, But Two Tails
언어
읽기 수준
기사 듣기
It has always been believed that the final segment of the human vertebral column, the coccyx, or tailbone, is the remnant of a lost tail. Now, some researchers assert it may be the vestige of not one but two tails, both of which humans and their closest relatives (great apes) managed to shed over millions of years of evolution.
이 기사의 나머지 부분을 읽고 학습 도구에 액세스하려면 등록해야합니다.
지금 학습 시작하기댓글 260개
bsc4년 이상Wow that is so fascinating!
noiwantthecandy4년 이상we don't have tails. if our ancestors had 1 or 2 tails and lost it, the tails would still be in their DNA and their child would have that tail, and so on. plus if we are fish we wouldn't be mammals. so it's science vs. science
adroit_avimimus3년 이상I think it means that some of the most basic forms of life were these fish. Some evolved lungs, legs, and started evolving from there once they started leaving the water every so often. Eventually, apes and monkey primates came along, which then evolved to ancient humans. It sounds bizarre thinking our ancestors were once fish, but it really is a matter of evolution, and time.
- Rosey6년 이하this is not true
- Bonnie6년 이하seriously?! we were NOT fish! by the way, if we were decended from fish, WHY COULDNT WE BRRATH UNDER WATER! *breath+
- cfj cool6년 이하cool but not realy are ansesters
- Cool m8!약 6년very good study
- Blackopps 4 fan6년 이상This was a good text
- yummyyum6년 이상better than fortnite.
- yummyyum6년 이상That is so cool!
- ayylien6년 이상very cool